Slavery

A slave by law is a person unjustly enslaved; a natural slave is a natural slave. Aristotle would view anyone captured in war who does not fight to the death to preserve their liberty as a natural slave. This has no modern analogy, but his idea that men who are no better than beasts mentally are natural slaves does: They exist in large numbers in America. There are a great number of people who through lack of appetite control have failed to maintain their physical form and thereby cannot participate as free-laborers in the mixed economy system that modern democratic republics follow. Compulsory education engenders a state of mind which does not value reason; philosophy is not taught at any level below the university and no high school geometry teacher is going to bother backing up their unit on proofs with one on syllogisms. In a mass-media society where consumption of entertainments equals most peoples use of their free-time, the populace cannot be said to be doing anything but depending on their base appetites to drive them. This would make them barbarians fit to be ruled by Hellenes in Aristotle's view. In addition, there is movement in all democratic republics to overturn that system and replace it with a police state oligarchy. So this would mean that those people who are still aware of their natural rights would be forced to lay them aside in a state of slavery by law, imposed by the greatest number against the interests of this minority. Since the use of reason is regarded by most as something they would rather not do, and actively destroyed in a process of bad diet, entertainments, and narcotic induced fogs, this would mean that a great number of modern citizens are putting themselves in the position of natural slaves.

Why I am not ready for Hillary

CLINTON: The Corrupt Yippie

Bill Clinton came to power when his opponent raised taxes after promising not to, and on the promise of an economic recovery. An unknown, he entered Washington from the outside. Many youth who are now adults will forever associate the nineties with the better parts of being younger. They are seeing history through rose-colored glasses. In fact Bill Clinton ran the most corrupt administration of the twentieth century, and began policies that ended in the financial collapse of 2008. He presided over an expansion of the intelligence agencies, an expansion of the traditional pentagon mission to include peacekeeping, the first skirmish of later frontal attacks on the constitution.

First, who was this man?You also may know a man by his associates.Clinton's known associates were felons.

One man, Daniel Lasater was part of a huge drug ring according to FBI. He was a Clinton associate in Arkansas. In connection to Iran contra, there were deep local allegations of cocaine trafficking into Mena Arkansas in tied in with the wider drug operations of Daniel Blandon. He was an associate of many known dirty lawyers, criminals in high places and a factory farm owner like that of the Tyson Corporation. The Clintons got tax breaks and ran various schemes. ADFA or the Arkansas Development Finance Authority was an organization accused of massive money laundering and general corrupt dealings.

Clinton was a man who liked to party. This is not necessarily a bad thing in a country with a long tradition of whiskey swilling unfaithful drunks in its high places of office. But it is a problem when it affects the running of the government itself. Hillary herself was involved in the notorious White Water scandal, which is a perfect example of the type of class-warfare decried by Democrats. They engaged in things that make a John Grisham villain look like a boy scout. People who had damaging information were subject to beatings from unknown thugs, such as the man who broke the idea of the Jennifer Flowers affair. This all happened prior to his election. This was common knowledge. The media covered the affairs of Clinton, but not the actual crime he engaged in during his Akransas years which included crimes that land ordinary people in prison for life. Sexual stories are always more interesting to entertain the common consumer of news. Such notions that a man running for President had associates who were involved in major drug-trafficking and who killed two kids for finding their operation would be highly threatening to those in power. It would suggest that America had more in common with Nicaragua than the Roman Republic and whose leader was closer to Manuel Noreiga in character than he was to a Jefferson. He was elected by the American people anyway, who depended on a media which through intimidation or sheer incompetence had failed to inform them.

Drug testing was eliminated for white house staff. Nice timing right?

Vince Foster showed up dead. Gunshot wound to the head, but perhaps the first ever to not include a copious amount of skull and brain matter according to witnesses arriving at the scene. But no matter, just like the boys who had met a mysterious end on the train tracks outside Mena that were ruled an accident, this death was ruled a suicide

There was a predictable reaction: The Republican Revolution. The republican revolution failed completely if its goals were those stated in the contract with America. It succeeded if its aim was to gain power. It was simply Republicans returning to power in the Congress. It passed many bills increasing the police state, expanding the drug war. It failed to accomplish even the minor gains of economic freedom against the State that had occurred during the Reagan years.

'Oxycontin Rush' Limbaugh became known nationally as an anti-clinton figure during his presidency. A later-revealed drug addict who advocated mandatory minimum sentences, Mr. Limbaugh gained national fame via attacks on the 'democrat' members of the criminal conspiracy known as the Federal Government and helped continue the delusion that Americans could elect change. He led the conservative charge against Clinton. This would make sense as to why the opposition to Clinton came to nothing: the Republican Gang had poor standard bearers as an opposition. This makes one wonder if anyone ever running for the Republican Party has ever been anything other than a Republican In Name Only. This is of course assuming that the republican party is conservative, which is an a-historical position. If of course, the Republican Crime Family is supposed to be the religious tinged, more openly corporate other arm of the ruling party, then their positions seem to make more sense.

Strange events happened domestically.

Terrorism struck the us in 1993 with the first WTC attack. This was the closest thing to a provable false flag that has ever happened. The FBI knowingly provided explosives to the cells trying to attack the building according to their own informant.

Ruby Ridge was the first of a few federal massacres to occur during these years. Randy Weaver was entrapped into trafficking in a sawed-off shotgun by a federal snitch. His court date came, and he declined to show up. The Government responded with paramilitary tactics. They surrounded his cabin in a rural area with armored vehicles. In short, it was a standoff against the Weaver family in which a federal sniper named Len Hourichi shot a pregnant woman through his sniper scope and FBI HRT commandos executed children with submachine guns. The laws under which Weaver was pursued are of course null and void since they violate the constitutional protection of firearms ownership.

The Brady bill was passed. It was named after a Secret Service agent who apparently did not get the memo that catching bullets is in the job description for the Secret Service, and the national pity for him was so great that the 2^nd Amendment was again ignored. Then came the siege at Waco. A strange religious group know as the Branch Davidians, later to be called a cult, were accused of illegally modifying semi-automatic weapons and hoarding explosives in preparation for the end of the world. After months of close watch, the federal authorities chose to storm the Davidians, approaching their communal home with their assault force concealed in cattle cars. No attempt was ever made to arrest any of them when they made their many trips into town. The Davidians were fired at first and lawfully returned fire. What the Davidians did was legal, constitutional, and right.

Of the Davidians, the following facts are good to keep in mind:

Roughly 80 stayed, while 50 left

Americans,Mexicans, one Israeli, British, Canadians made up the group.

Davidians used kerosene lamps to light their compound. These were tipped over. Recently, the government claimed Chris Dorner's death was caused by flash-bangs that ignited his cabin. Funny, but they denied this at Waco. Needless to say, tanks assaulted the building. FLIR evidence shows gunfire from the federal agents into the burning building. Another allegation involves a shaped charge placed upon a fireproofed building in which women and children were taking cover. While proof is impossible to come by in many of the facts surrounding this atrocity- where there is smoke, there is fire. The federal death squad members then posed over the bodies like it was a military conquest.

April 19^th: where American liberty was born, and where it died years later.

Pay attention when the government starts to burn people. It hard to decide whether the event was something that happened with shades of the Holocaust or the Witch Burnings of Europe. Given the attacks by the media on the mores and practices of the group, one can see a bit of both.

The Oklahoma City Bombing followed. After much confusion, a Tim McVeigh was caught, his conspirators rounded up, and with some of the 'others involved' evidence against him, convicted.

Curiously, McVeigh claimed to have been an operative for the U.S. government in letters to his sister and in rumored claims to a cellmate. These are insane statements if he was indeed the man he was convicted to be, and are out of step with the cool and collected man who claimed responsibility for the bombing and expressed little remorse for his actions. Either, he was lying and was crazy, or this has some ring of truth. One would not lie to one’s own sister when death was looming close in the form of an executioner.

In the McVeigh Tapes, aired by MSNBC, he lays out his rationale. He claims to be avenging Waco. Later, he doesn’t repudiate his tactics, but says if he had read Unintended Consequences he would have done things differently.

There were further terrorist attacks, bin Laden was implicated and became and international figure. The administration declined their chances to catch the former Tim Osman, and he remained free to become the prime scapegoat for the 9/11 attacks and the man of a thousand skin-pigmentations and facial structures that we all enjoyed in the post-9/11 nightmare world. Cruise missiles worth millions were used to ineffectually lob conventional warheads at various brown people in 3^rd world countries. Multiple chances to nab Osama were bungled.

There was no appreciable peace dividend after fifty years of near armageddon.

The world had escaped world war 3 but there was no leaving perpetual war. America filled the strategic gap, but there was no massive scale-down of the military like the previous world wars. The habits and mindset of the cold war remained. Peacekeeping has always been a historically dubious label for a military exercise. This was the task of the Pentagon during the Clinton years

Tactitus quotes an ancient Scottish chief:

‘Whenever I consider the origin of this war and the necessities of our position, I have a sure confidence that this day, and this union of yours, will be the beginning of freedom to the whole of Britain. To all of us slavery is a thing unknown; there are no lands beyond us, and even the sea is not safe, menaced as we are by a Roman fleet. And thus in war and battle, in which the brave find glory, even the coward will find safety. Former contests, in which, with varying fortune, the Romans were resisted, still left in us a last hope of succour, inasmuch as being the most renowned nation of Britain, dwelling in the very heart of the country, and out of sight of the shores of the conquered, we could keep even our eyes unpolluted by the contagion of slavery. To us who dwell on the uttermost confines of the earth and of freedom, this remote sanctuary of Britain's glory has up to this time been a defence. Now, however, the furthest limits of Britain are thrown open, and the unknown always passes for the marvellous. But there are no tribes beyond us, nothing indeed but waves and rocks, and the yet more terrible Romans, from whose oppression escape is vainly sought by obedience and submission. Robbers of the world, having by their universal plunder exhausted the land, they rifle the deep. If the enemy be rich, they are rapacious; if he be poor, they lust for dominion; neither the east nor the west has been able to satisfy them. Alone among men they covet with equal eagerness poverty and riches. To robbery, slaughter, plunder, they give the lying name of empire; they make a solitude and call it peace’

This is the essence of Peacekeeping.

The Clinton-era redefined the U.S. Mission to that of peacekeeping and saw a major campaign initiated in the Balkans against supposed Genocides. This was the final act of destruction in the long train of events ending the Yugoslavian state. America supported the terrorist KLA in a conflict where the U.S. Had no national interest, and brought us to the edge of conflict with Russia. Kosovo was allowed to break away, and cleanse its own christian population. Al Qaeda, for the first time since the Soviet Afghan War, was fighting in cooperation with American foreign policy objectives.

The Impeachment of Clinton was attempted: not due to technology transfers to china, not due to felonies, not for possible murder, not for another illegal American war, not for the first WTC attack where the FBI allowed terrorists to acquire the weapons, not for numerous white collar crimes, but for a blowjob. Naturally one cannot expect for the Congress to go against the type of lobbying that provided the Chinese man with the chance to sell the Communist Chinese ICBM plans if the congress itself is engaged in this. Or for that matter to investigate the type of crimes which they themselves engaged in. Or go after the president for drugs when this would merely disrupt the bipartisan cooperation in pursuit of coke and high class hookers.

The Year 2000 came. The computers were not destroyed by having the wrong date.

People seek the end of the world for many reasons; psychological, sociological, religious and ultimately anthropological. There has always been something about America as a nation that has seemed to herald a ‘New Age’. Hence the strange and creepy ‘Novo Ordo Seclorum’ on the dollar.

The Puritans came here to establish God’s kingdom. The Mormons were chased West to build theirs. The Whites ended the world of the natives; the natives themselves have many prophecies. Some Mayan Calendars stopped at 2012, leading to the last craze for the end.

The supposed end in the year 2000 was based on Biblical and then technical grounds. It did not occur, unless one considers the election of George W Bush a herald of the end times.

Video bibliography

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9sPJqmkdQI&list=WLGMH5DUuPQmrawxp9Nxw-4uYnVjublb-s

Clinton Chronicles

Terrorstorm

Kosovo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGT1F0jYhFw&list=WLGMH5DUuPQmrawxp9Nxw-4uYnVjublb-s

Skulls

The 'Skulls', notes from Anthony Sutton's work on the subject

An Example of Elite intermarriage.

Is George W. Bush the product of inbreeding?

“From time to time their plans go awry.” p. 53

“The left leaning segment in the press can always be relied upon to automatically assault ideas and information from the right, and vice versa” ibid

“....the in-group lacks morality and diversity. Its a kind of jet set politburo. Charming, power hungry and myopic at the same time...”

“It is doubtful if John D Rockefeller or Mrs Russell Sage, and certainly the Ford family, ever understood how these funds would be used for a long term conditioning plan”

The elite need shadows, hence the plethora of secret societies existing for their private needs, outside of even the confines of a secret government.

'The point to hold in mind is that both groups use Hegelian theory of the state as a start point, ie the state is superior to the individual. Prussian militarism, Nazism and Marxism have the same philosophical roots.'

p.63

'all that exists publicly for the order is the charter of the Russell Trust and that tells you nothing'-p.66

'Hegelian absurdities have thoroughly penetrated the U.S. educational system....'

-p. 118

“Some of the biggest men in the US and in commerce and manufacturing know that there is a power so organized, so subtle, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when condemning it.”

-Woodrow Wilson

Ethos

How free are men to choose their path in life and what are the limits of what one can do in life? Are they on the plains or in the mountains?

Our bodies remember the hunter gatherer days, and there is no reason to assume that it is not buried somewhere in our psyche, and all the collectivism versus individualism comes from this memory.

If our bodies are sick in cities, eating the agriculturalist’s diet, how about our spirit?

Nozick/Rawls Notes

The veil of ignorance blocks off this knowledge, such that one does not know what burdens and benefits of social cooperation might fall to him/her once the veil is lifted. With this knowledge blocked, parties to the original position must decide on principles for the distribution of rights, positions and resources in their society.

1. Nozick's discussion of Rawls's theory of justice raises the dialogue between libertarianism and liberalism to an epic level. The entitlement theory is sketched. In slogan form it states, "From each as they choose, to each as they are chosen". It comprises a theory of (1) justice in acquisition; (2) justice in rectification if (1) is violated (rectification which might require apparently redistributive measures); (3) justice in holdings, and (4) justice in transfer. Assuming justice in acquisition, entitlement to holdings is a function of repeated applications of (3) and (4). Nozick's entitlement theory is a non-patterned historical principle. Almost all other principles of distributive justice (egalitarianism, utilitarianism) are patterned principles of justice. Such principles follow the form, "to each according to...

Nozick’s view, is that all non-entitlement theories of justice are false. For all such theories claim that it is a necessary condition for a distribution’s being just that it have a certain structure or fit a certain pattern; but the Wilt Chamberlain example (which can be reformulated so that D1 is, instead of an egalitarian distribution, a distribution according to hard work, desert, or whatever) shows that a distribution (such as D2) can be just even if it doesn’t have a particular structure or pattern.
Moreover, the example shows that “liberty upsets patterns,” that allowing individuals freely to use their holdings as they choose will inevitably destroy any distribution advocated by non-entitlement theories, whether they be socialist, egalitarian liberal, or some other theory of distribution. And the corollary of this is that patterns destroy liberty, that attempts to enforce a particular distributional pattern or structure over time will necessarily involve intolerable levels of coercion, forbidding individuals from using the fruits of their talents, abilities, and labor as they see fit.

Secession

Pros:

The federal government has failed to secure the border, seceding would allow Texas to secure itself against the failed country it borders to the south.

Everyone in Texas would cease paying the illegal income tax. This would mean a mass of capital available.

Texas could get away from using the dollar whose value has been dropping consistently

Texas national guard would not be deployed to the Eurasian landmass to fight low intensity conflicts when they are supposed to be weekend warriors who assist in disasters

Texas would now be able to negotiate its own trade treaties, to benefit its workers. This would mean no NAFTA/ CAFTA with its economic dislocations

Texas could follow the will of its people in regards to abortion as Roe v. Wade would not apply

Texas would be free to develop without the mass of federal regulation. This would mean high international competitiveness. Texas is a globally competitive-sized economy as is. This would also mean more small business

Texas could uphold its anti-drone statutes, extend protections to the right to bear arms, and opt out of the Obamacare disaster as well as any future disasters legislated by Washington

Texas would be free to set its own minimum wage laws. This would create jobs

Texas would be free from Corporate Taxes. This could mean even more companies headquartering in Austin and more activity in the Houston Port. Federal duties on shipping would be gone.

Texas would be free to enforce existing drug statues according to the model used by the federal government or revamp them.

No excise taxes on tobacco and liquor. No more environmental regulation at the federal level.

Cons: the U.S. Federal Government believes in a strong union theory of the Constitution that regards secession as illegal because the constitution represents 'government by the people as a whole' rather than by the states coming together as units and forming the federal government. This would mean they would respond with force as they have in the past when states tried to leave the union. Another problem would be all recipients of federal aid would be out of their benefits.

Frontier

Up to our own day American history has been in a large degree the history of the colonization of the Great West....The frontier is the line of the most rapid and effective Americanization....The frontier promoted the formation of a composite nationality for the American people....The legislation which most developed the powers of the national government, and played the largest part in its activity, was conditioned on the frontier....The pioneer needed the goods of the coast, and so the grand series of internal improvements and railroad legislation began, with potent nationalizing effects....But the most important effect of the frontier has been the promotion of democracy here and in Europe. As has been indicated, the frontier is productive of individualism....It produces antipathy to control, and particularly to any direct control....The frontier states that came into the Union in the first quarter of a century of its existence came in with democratic suffrage provisions, and had reactive effects of the highest importance upon the older states....
To the frontier the American intellect owes its striking characteristics. That coarseness and strength combined with acuteness and inquisitiveness; that practical, inventive turn of mind, quick to find expedients....What the Mediterranean Sea was to the Greeks, breaking the bond of custom, offering new experiences, calling out new institutions and activities, that, and more, the ever retreating frontier has been to the United States directly, and to the nations of Europe more remotely. And now, four centuries from the discovery of America, at the end of a hundred years of life under the Constitution, the frontier has gone, and with its going has closed the first period of American history.

-Frederick Jackson Turner

Hiatus

College. I am entering my late 20s, which makes me a late-bloomer to this college thing, but I am on track to graduate sooner than any member of my family. My first job was as a VB programmer.

Here are my college tips:

College is a lifestyle. It is kind of like a march through a minefield. Sometimes you will get popped. The way people live in college his highly illegal and highly unhealthy in the long run. Keith Richards is some sort of freak- his lifestyle isn’t something you would want to do over time.

If you get out without a legal issue, you will have some personality ones. People work doubles and then try to pull off studying and people wonder why Adderall is popular.

-Take as much AP as possible in HS.

-CLEP testing

-Community college

-Pick your four-year school wisely

Drop out if you have to. You can always come back. Consider vocational training or a two-year degree. Expand your resume. Don’t get stuck in food service unless you are a well-paid manager.

Don’t get fucked over by landlords.

Debt isn’t good. Avoid it until your last two years. Pick your major. Stick to it, drop out if you need to find yourself. This isn’t your education. You will have to get that on your own.

Why get a degree if its worthless? To emigrate, become and officer in the military, or become a manger. Be careful with this last one- you can just work hard and get this without the degree.

The Death of the 4th Estate

Media is collectively stabbing our reason to death. I cannot watch more than a segment of news without erupting in a rage or bursting into incredulous laughter.

I have re-named the major outlets as follows:

Fascist Obfuscation Xenophobia

Communicating Nothing News

Maoist Socialism Nationally Broadcast Corporately.

Crime Simulcast Publicly to an Apathetic Nation

I hope the names in the post get the point across and I don’t have to explain why Fox needed a NINA sign for the day O’Reilly jumped ship or why I liked Al Sharpton better when he was fat or why the whoever the fuck CNN puts on these days isn’t worth your time.

What is the American media, and what does it want?

The media has again proved itself a pack of bloodthirsty hounds

The media is pushing a product: the victim.

This is not just the ‘liberal’ media. The media loves victims.

It wants you to worry about the economy, and a job, instead of making your own business.

It wants you to get a degree, instead of educating yourself.

It wants you programmed with weak music.

It wants you disarmed, on the dole.

It wants you to fear those brown guys, wherever they are. While they are at it, also some Chechens.

Worry about fuel prices, instead of getting yourself off the grid.

That sick feeling you get every day when you have to deal with the idiotic behavior in today's society? You are just crazy. Here are some drugs that they SWEAR are better for you than that evil devil weed that is illegal for your own good.

It wants you to chase after that male or female whore, whatever your sex or persuasion. Whatever you do, be an adolescent the rest of your life. It wants you addicted.

The History channel is living up to its acronym which now represents the favorite recreation of their viewers. You can watch it blame everything on aliens and you can even see Tornado Bait Television about pawn shops.

Look at the recent Jody Arrias story. Here is what happened: a petite woman killed a fully fit young man and cut hit throat. It was his fault. The real story here: pick the right mate, and learn some basic self-defense. It is common to even small animals, let alone hand-to-hand combat proficiency.

Look at the three women abducted and held for ten years. The real story: do not raise your daughters to be victims. A woman choked and raped by an ex-boyfriend and a local police department that could not respond. The real story: learn to defend yourself and take responsibility for those you associate with.

 Too bad Casto didn’t try to abduct Jody. Then we would have real info-tainment

Obama Contra Putin

-OR WHY AMERICA NEEDS TO PAY RUSSIA SOME RESPECT

                With an American currently under arrest in Russia for spying, it seems that a New Cold War is afoot, with Vladimir Putin re-arming the Russian military to reassert Russia’s position in the world. What is going on? Russia was supposed to have been outspent in the Cold War, and happy to be a power among powers gladly accepting American preeminence. This is the common conception. This is the common error.

                Why are Russia and America in constant conflict?

                There seems to be an endless war with Russia fueled by an American need to hate the Slavs. Race has a place in the discussion. Slavs, and people east of the Elbe, have been regarded as inferior ever since Rome drew its borders along the Rhine. We are the cultural inheritors of this European tradition of regarding Russians as inferior beings by virtue of their mere existence astride their swath of the Eurasian landmass.

                There was a fear in America, a fear of communism, which flared up with the destruction of the Tzar. It is called the Red Scare, and predated McCarthyism by a few decades.                          

The first Red Scare dates from the 20s and 30s with the Moscow show trials. It seemed that Russia had some power to turn humans into Marxist Zombies.

                                In WW2 the Soviets lost more people than any nation in the fight against Hitler, of which Stephen Ambrose has never written a book. Stalingrad, Vyazma, Kursk, Berlin. These battles destroyed the Reich. Russian armies got their trucks from America freeing their factories to produce T-34s, the best tank of the war.

                                Who financed the Russian buildup? Elites in the West. This is a fact. Russia was a society which ran on money and needed to get this money somewhere. Lenin was transported by train to Russia by the German monarchy. He only won majority once and named the Bolsheviks after this fact. Russian slave labor was used in these Russian projects.                  

We responded in the 50s with Gestapo tactics against those who were Communists. We then instituted MK Ultra and hired ‘ex’ Nazis to do our work, begging the question why we even bothered to fight a war against them in the first place. Meanwhile European Russia was still largely a wasteland from its occupation by the German Army. The Cold War was a mutual paranoia of two superpowers and their people. World War 2 has a lot to do as to why both countries expected a surprise attack: both nations entered the most destructive war in history via surprise attacks, in spite of the multiple warnings they both received about Pearl Harbor and Barbarossa.

                Curiously, WMDs and MAD that kept conventional war between the two powers from erupting. Our strategy now seems to be to ignore our current nuclear stockpile and deter WMD attacks via invasion, in opposition to our approach during the cold war.

                The Cold War ended with the U.S. having ‘outspent’ the Soviets, and then promptly adopting the same type of military overspending and insane governmental policy that ruined the Soviets. Since Putin, Russia has kept up the type of economic growth only dreamed of by U.S. presidents and maintains a tax code that is fairer than ours. In addition, Putin has reined in oligarchs following the financial collapse.

We gave them TARP.

                Russia has maintained a conservative foreign policy. We have surrounded both Russia and China with bases and did not admit Russia to NATO when they asked to join. There has never been a Russian-American alliance against China. In their war against Chechnya, we have not taken their side despite apparent common interest.   

The Cold War was a perpetual war. Sun Tzu says this is bad. It is.

                Let’s compare Putin to Obama.

                Putin: probably shot and tortured people.

                Obama: organized some poor people to, whatever, grumble?

                Putin: high level Judo combatant

                Obama: Beat a…….Mormon….in the last election….

                Get it together America

                Though at press time it has been reported that Obama had taken up the practice of extra-judicial killing.

China

China

China is in fact a paper tiger whose elite has sold its country down the same river of oblivion as the elite of this nation. China always has been a militarily weak nation. As displayed during the Tianamen protests, its populace is a disarmed mob. China’s current military strategy, while seeking grand visions of ruling half of the pacific; funded by black money that it does not report to the international community, but in fact it is merely seeking to make itself strong enough to survive the inevitable debtor-creditor war which is certain to strike once the United States loses its currency and China dumps its dollars. Mass economic dislocation will take place on both sides of the Pacific and Neo-Fascist retrenchment will be seen on both sides. There has been a sort of strange meeting in the middle; a borrowing of corporate authoritarianism from China. There is in turn a borrowing of a bit of so called freedom from the U.S. into China. What is emerging is a global multinational consensus towards totalitarian capital.  The rise of China owes itself entirely to the blood-soaked currency which flows from China into K-Street and into Wall Street. The biggest of the scandals involving this nation was the downright traitorous transfers of technology by the Clinton administration enabling Beijing to build its first ICBMs.

            The rise of China is not some grand history making axis as some have portrayed it, but it is merely analogous to the rise of another western nation. That said, China is setting goals and careening toward them. Their government is effective and hungry. China, over a period of decades, devoured alive all North American manufacturing and defecated its results to Wal-Mart. Investors have piled in more dollars than it would've taken to make the necessary upgrades to industry in the states many times over. Shipbuilding in China was allowed to rise funded by the west. Roadways and rails link the country and allow the central government to extend control over various ethnic groups. Abroad, both Venezula and Iran benefit from China. Economic rights, while expanded have not translated into political rights. India is threatened by China, who deploys missiles in Tibet directly north of them. The Russian far-east is flooded with immigrants from China.            

Washington has allowed China to rise.

Qui Bono?

Quotes

'The ideal of super capitalism is the standardization of humans from cradle to grave.”

'When does a capitalistic concern cease to be an economic phenomenon? When its size transforms it into a social one. It is then that the concern......throws itself like a dead weight into the arms of the state. It is then that state intervention begins and becomes ever more necessary'

'Now we are burying economic liberalism'

-Mussolini

Socialism

Socialism

Most nominal free-thinkers are only products of their time. If the socialist be in a minority; they will self-destruct. If in majority, they will wipe out all minority opinions. They do not kill ideas by debate, as this is the only way to change them, but rather they kill the holders of ideas. Thus, once a communist system comes into power it will prevent any from changing the system as they did.  Socialism is a parasite. Capitalism has never been practiced anywhere. There have never been any free-trades in the purely philosophical sense. But socialism is simply built on the idea of destroying Greater Man by feeding on him dozens of lesser everymen. The greater person may have different stripes of wealth, whether in the possession of money, spirit, or even happiness attained. But this person will be dragged down. This is ultimately why, in a psycho-spiritual sense, socialism develops constant shortages and degradation. The final material destruction comes after the spiritual fetters have come to the citizens of a truly ‘socially-minded’ people. Economics as practiced in the west has commodification to answer this.

            Political Correctness is a communist term and for it to come to fore in the west should have sent far more shudders down spines than it did. Once a man is robbed of his thoughts, his intellectual life taken from him,  he is robbed of his chance to procreate in the most lasting sense.

            State education will never allow him to pass the ideas to his children.  Government education is a crime perpetrated on the individual, and is a process of regimentation.

            Human freedom will never be reached or attained by the overthrow of one social system and the institution of another. Socialism is inherently dictatorial. Governments arise from the dispositions of men in them; from the culture- the art, the philosophy, et al that make up its constituents; and the material factors; economy and the physical facts of life, geography and sociological environs. Humanities’ metaphysical nature is as an individual.

            The ten points of the communist manifesto are in effect in every nation and as such can be regarded as gospel, whether conscious or otherwise, for the modern state.

            Nanny state socialism is the religion of our time.

Proletarian dictatorship is an oxymoron. Marx was merely reshaping the Leviathan to evolving times. Government and money are instituted, and are not natural to humans, though they descend from natural impulses. Money is a holder of value, and if anyone wishes to see a state without money who later acquired it, one should look to Sparta prior and then after the Peloponnesian war. Money, where it is lacking in civilization, tends to return. Without it, societies have to find another means to judge men, none of which is so readily available.  

Commoners

The common era-

What is the common era? A phrase which many have used to describe that once would have been A.D.

CE: Common Era. You live in it.

What is cledonism? Divination by means of listening to the random ravings of the insane.

We listen to cledonists when the mad are the only ones left to tell the truth. Our prophets are madmen when the collective decides that the truth is anathema to its further entertainment, which is the foremost living purpose of every person in this dystopian world.

                That’s right. The world is the science fiction dystopia you read about in all of your cyber-punk books. The villains are everywhere and Anonymous and anyone under arrest at a political protest are its heroes. If one craves simplification, there it is. The New World Order isn’t coming. It is here. We can’t stop a police state from arising on American shores- that would take a time machine. If one wants to become totally powerless- believe the Illuminati and Bohemian Grove control the earth and that you can do nothing to stop their gigantic web of control. This is true, except it is also, too easy. Were it so  easy. Instead your oppression is at hand- it is the police officer in his Black Shirt uniform. Your next tax bill. Your next ticket under an unnecessary law. Your friend in jail. Those drug laws. Oppression. It’s a collective problem now. It isn’t just something you have to worry about if you are born a particular color. It started a long time ago. It isn’t just the fault of the asshole we last elected, who happens to be ‘black’.

The Common Era. It is the reason that grown men would laugh at a movie where a male talked about ‘fake-chowing’ a woman- as if any man that didn’t like the taste of a woman wasn’t outright gay in the first place. No, it is not that it is bad to be so; it’s that it is bad for someone to be in denial(ehem Rick Perry)

Americans are schizophrenic in the extreme. We have many philosophies at many different times.  So it goes says Vonnegut.

We have ‘killed our mother’, in this Common Era.

Avatar was just the Trail of Tears in space; except for that Happy Little Big Horn battle at the end. The real trail of tears ended in the eradication of an entire continent of people-began by Columbus.

What is the Common Era? It is the piles of shit-sandwiches being fed into your face so Hollywood stars can feed their ego-cocaine addictions. The real entertainment industry is the plethora of hack writers heaving this at the world and seeing how much of it we will eat.

Problems of Our Time

We face the rise of both a Fascistic philosophy that would fit with that of a Mussolini, and the rise of a Socialism which could best be described as nanny-state. The combination of these two could be called a National Socialism. Thus, we face the rise of a Nazi philosophy in the United States.

We face societies, some in the dark; such as Skull and Bones, Bohemian Grove, the treasonous Bilderberg group; and others in the open- the iron triangle of lobbying and regulation, the interlocking corporate directorships- that all have no allegiance to the ideas in the Constitution, no ties of loyalty to the country, and firmly believe in the destruction of the nation-state if for no other reason than a sort of marxist-like 'historical inevitability'.

This is a problem of our time.

We face the systematic criminality of wall street, the cascading false wealth born of speculation, collective human stupidity, rampant fraud and every financial scandal borne of government intervention and corporate malfeasance. The magnitude of white collar crime feeds and uses blue collar crime, while going far beyond it in illicit profits and going largely unpunished. All the while, the white collar criminals also benefit from the jailing and disenfranchisement of the blue collar criminals.

This is a problem of our time.

We face the evisceration of the Constitution by every administration in recent memory. Moving in the black world of intelligence, the worst crimes go unnoticed, and when they do, they will go unpunished. We face a surveillance state. We face a state which has codified laws that no one in history had the gall to actually write down: that of secret arrest without trial, all the while our actor politicians still pay lip service to a Republic they never understood and never cared to learn of. We face laws every four-years which destroy the rule of law itself.

This is a problem of our time.

We face a dictatorship of the executive branch. We face the end of the Republic.

We face continued wars of dubious origin and strategy. We face endless war in the middle east. There is a struggle for the last push to reach the summit of peak oil. We face a radical Islamic enemy, who has been funded and supported by western governments in the struggle against the Soviets in Afghanistan. It rests on a theological foundation which pre-dates the existence of the U.S. by at least ten centuries. Even now, the rebellions in the Middle East, from Libya to Syria, are calculated to disturb the Iranian influence in the near east and pave the way for an assault on Iran.

This is a problem of our time.

We face the decimation of the labor system which was a collective apparatus for resisting corporate collective influence. Co-opted by criminals, its internal structure was rotted as it collected dues from all in a profession and in a true government fashion used violence to force non-union workers out. Through free-trade; unmitigated by and concern of gutting whole generations of jobs, and bad-work-protectionism, this system has fallen to leave the american worker at the whim of internationalist corporate bosses who care nothing for country, law, or Constitution. They also care nothing for the well being of their workers; be they foreign workers or those whose job was outsourced. We face wave after wave of immigration which means a slave wage for those desperate enough to cross the border, and an ethnic-closed shop to those without experience who would traditionally gain it in the lower wage sectors of the economy.

This is a problem of our time.

We face a military which has drilled for domestic operations in the United States since the 90s, a military which is now empowered to arrest us and take us to a singularity-like Black Site. We face a plan to disarm Americans. We face existing contingency plans which end in a mass internment of citizens.

We the people, face these problems, and we face the end of the Republic

These are the problems of our time, but what are the solutions?