Slavery

A slave by law is a person unjustly enslaved; a natural slave is a natural slave. Aristotle would view anyone captured in war who does not fight to the death to preserve their liberty as a natural slave. This has no modern analogy, but his idea that men who are no better than beasts mentally are natural slaves does: They exist in large numbers in America. There are a great number of people who through lack of appetite control have failed to maintain their physical form and thereby cannot participate as free-laborers in the mixed economy system that modern democratic republics follow. Compulsory education engenders a state of mind which does not value reason; philosophy is not taught at any level below the university and no high school geometry teacher is going to bother backing up their unit on proofs with one on syllogisms. In a mass-media society where consumption of entertainments equals most peoples use of their free-time, the populace cannot be said to be doing anything but depending on their base appetites to drive them. This would make them barbarians fit to be ruled by Hellenes in Aristotle's view. In addition, there is movement in all democratic republics to overturn that system and replace it with a police state oligarchy. So this would mean that those people who are still aware of their natural rights would be forced to lay them aside in a state of slavery by law, imposed by the greatest number against the interests of this minority. Since the use of reason is regarded by most as something they would rather not do, and actively destroyed in a process of bad diet, entertainments, and narcotic induced fogs, this would mean that a great number of modern citizens are putting themselves in the position of natural slaves.

Why I am not ready for Hillary

CLINTON: The Corrupt Yippie

Bill Clinton came to power when his opponent raised taxes after promising not to, and on the promise of an economic recovery. An unknown, he entered Washington from the outside. Many youth who are now adults will forever associate the nineties with the better parts of being younger. They are seeing history through rose-colored glasses. In fact Bill Clinton ran the most corrupt administration of the twentieth century, and began policies that ended in the financial collapse of 2008. He presided over an expansion of the intelligence agencies, an expansion of the traditional pentagon mission to include peacekeeping, the first skirmish of later frontal attacks on the constitution.

First, who was this man?You also may know a man by his associates.Clinton's known associates were felons.

One man, Daniel Lasater was part of a huge drug ring according to FBI. He was a Clinton associate in Arkansas. In connection to Iran contra, there were deep local allegations of cocaine trafficking into Mena Arkansas in tied in with the wider drug operations of Daniel Blandon. He was an associate of many known dirty lawyers, criminals in high places and a factory farm owner like that of the Tyson Corporation. The Clintons got tax breaks and ran various schemes. ADFA or the Arkansas Development Finance Authority was an organization accused of massive money laundering and general corrupt dealings.

Clinton was a man who liked to party. This is not necessarily a bad thing in a country with a long tradition of whiskey swilling unfaithful drunks in its high places of office. But it is a problem when it affects the running of the government itself. Hillary herself was involved in the notorious White Water scandal, which is a perfect example of the type of class-warfare decried by Democrats. They engaged in things that make a John Grisham villain look like a boy scout. People who had damaging information were subject to beatings from unknown thugs, such as the man who broke the idea of the Jennifer Flowers affair. This all happened prior to his election. This was common knowledge. The media covered the affairs of Clinton, but not the actual crime he engaged in during his Akransas years which included crimes that land ordinary people in prison for life. Sexual stories are always more interesting to entertain the common consumer of news. Such notions that a man running for President had associates who were involved in major drug-trafficking and who killed two kids for finding their operation would be highly threatening to those in power. It would suggest that America had more in common with Nicaragua than the Roman Republic and whose leader was closer to Manuel Noreiga in character than he was to a Jefferson. He was elected by the American people anyway, who depended on a media which through intimidation or sheer incompetence had failed to inform them.

Drug testing was eliminated for white house staff. Nice timing right?

Vince Foster showed up dead. Gunshot wound to the head, but perhaps the first ever to not include a copious amount of skull and brain matter according to witnesses arriving at the scene. But no matter, just like the boys who had met a mysterious end on the train tracks outside Mena that were ruled an accident, this death was ruled a suicide

There was a predictable reaction: The Republican Revolution. The republican revolution failed completely if its goals were those stated in the contract with America. It succeeded if its aim was to gain power. It was simply Republicans returning to power in the Congress. It passed many bills increasing the police state, expanding the drug war. It failed to accomplish even the minor gains of economic freedom against the State that had occurred during the Reagan years.

'Oxycontin Rush' Limbaugh became known nationally as an anti-clinton figure during his presidency. A later-revealed drug addict who advocated mandatory minimum sentences, Mr. Limbaugh gained national fame via attacks on the 'democrat' members of the criminal conspiracy known as the Federal Government and helped continue the delusion that Americans could elect change. He led the conservative charge against Clinton. This would make sense as to why the opposition to Clinton came to nothing: the Republican Gang had poor standard bearers as an opposition. This makes one wonder if anyone ever running for the Republican Party has ever been anything other than a Republican In Name Only. This is of course assuming that the republican party is conservative, which is an a-historical position. If of course, the Republican Crime Family is supposed to be the religious tinged, more openly corporate other arm of the ruling party, then their positions seem to make more sense.

Strange events happened domestically.

Terrorism struck the us in 1993 with the first WTC attack. This was the closest thing to a provable false flag that has ever happened. The FBI knowingly provided explosives to the cells trying to attack the building according to their own informant.

Ruby Ridge was the first of a few federal massacres to occur during these years. Randy Weaver was entrapped into trafficking in a sawed-off shotgun by a federal snitch. His court date came, and he declined to show up. The Government responded with paramilitary tactics. They surrounded his cabin in a rural area with armored vehicles. In short, it was a standoff against the Weaver family in which a federal sniper named Len Hourichi shot a pregnant woman through his sniper scope and FBI HRT commandos executed children with submachine guns. The laws under which Weaver was pursued are of course null and void since they violate the constitutional protection of firearms ownership.

The Brady bill was passed. It was named after a Secret Service agent who apparently did not get the memo that catching bullets is in the job description for the Secret Service, and the national pity for him was so great that the 2^nd Amendment was again ignored. Then came the siege at Waco. A strange religious group know as the Branch Davidians, later to be called a cult, were accused of illegally modifying semi-automatic weapons and hoarding explosives in preparation for the end of the world. After months of close watch, the federal authorities chose to storm the Davidians, approaching their communal home with their assault force concealed in cattle cars. No attempt was ever made to arrest any of them when they made their many trips into town. The Davidians were fired at first and lawfully returned fire. What the Davidians did was legal, constitutional, and right.

Of the Davidians, the following facts are good to keep in mind:

Roughly 80 stayed, while 50 left

Americans,Mexicans, one Israeli, British, Canadians made up the group.

Davidians used kerosene lamps to light their compound. These were tipped over. Recently, the government claimed Chris Dorner's death was caused by flash-bangs that ignited his cabin. Funny, but they denied this at Waco. Needless to say, tanks assaulted the building. FLIR evidence shows gunfire from the federal agents into the burning building. Another allegation involves a shaped charge placed upon a fireproofed building in which women and children were taking cover. While proof is impossible to come by in many of the facts surrounding this atrocity- where there is smoke, there is fire. The federal death squad members then posed over the bodies like it was a military conquest.

April 19^th: where American liberty was born, and where it died years later.

Pay attention when the government starts to burn people. It hard to decide whether the event was something that happened with shades of the Holocaust or the Witch Burnings of Europe. Given the attacks by the media on the mores and practices of the group, one can see a bit of both.

The Oklahoma City Bombing followed. After much confusion, a Tim McVeigh was caught, his conspirators rounded up, and with some of the 'others involved' evidence against him, convicted.

Curiously, McVeigh claimed to have been an operative for the U.S. government in letters to his sister and in rumored claims to a cellmate. These are insane statements if he was indeed the man he was convicted to be, and are out of step with the cool and collected man who claimed responsibility for the bombing and expressed little remorse for his actions. Either, he was lying and was crazy, or this has some ring of truth. One would not lie to one’s own sister when death was looming close in the form of an executioner.

In the McVeigh Tapes, aired by MSNBC, he lays out his rationale. He claims to be avenging Waco. Later, he doesn’t repudiate his tactics, but says if he had read Unintended Consequences he would have done things differently.

There were further terrorist attacks, bin Laden was implicated and became and international figure. The administration declined their chances to catch the former Tim Osman, and he remained free to become the prime scapegoat for the 9/11 attacks and the man of a thousand skin-pigmentations and facial structures that we all enjoyed in the post-9/11 nightmare world. Cruise missiles worth millions were used to ineffectually lob conventional warheads at various brown people in 3^rd world countries. Multiple chances to nab Osama were bungled.

There was no appreciable peace dividend after fifty years of near armageddon.

The world had escaped world war 3 but there was no leaving perpetual war. America filled the strategic gap, but there was no massive scale-down of the military like the previous world wars. The habits and mindset of the cold war remained. Peacekeeping has always been a historically dubious label for a military exercise. This was the task of the Pentagon during the Clinton years

Tactitus quotes an ancient Scottish chief:

‘Whenever I consider the origin of this war and the necessities of our position, I have a sure confidence that this day, and this union of yours, will be the beginning of freedom to the whole of Britain. To all of us slavery is a thing unknown; there are no lands beyond us, and even the sea is not safe, menaced as we are by a Roman fleet. And thus in war and battle, in which the brave find glory, even the coward will find safety. Former contests, in which, with varying fortune, the Romans were resisted, still left in us a last hope of succour, inasmuch as being the most renowned nation of Britain, dwelling in the very heart of the country, and out of sight of the shores of the conquered, we could keep even our eyes unpolluted by the contagion of slavery. To us who dwell on the uttermost confines of the earth and of freedom, this remote sanctuary of Britain's glory has up to this time been a defence. Now, however, the furthest limits of Britain are thrown open, and the unknown always passes for the marvellous. But there are no tribes beyond us, nothing indeed but waves and rocks, and the yet more terrible Romans, from whose oppression escape is vainly sought by obedience and submission. Robbers of the world, having by their universal plunder exhausted the land, they rifle the deep. If the enemy be rich, they are rapacious; if he be poor, they lust for dominion; neither the east nor the west has been able to satisfy them. Alone among men they covet with equal eagerness poverty and riches. To robbery, slaughter, plunder, they give the lying name of empire; they make a solitude and call it peace’

This is the essence of Peacekeeping.

The Clinton-era redefined the U.S. Mission to that of peacekeeping and saw a major campaign initiated in the Balkans against supposed Genocides. This was the final act of destruction in the long train of events ending the Yugoslavian state. America supported the terrorist KLA in a conflict where the U.S. Had no national interest, and brought us to the edge of conflict with Russia. Kosovo was allowed to break away, and cleanse its own christian population. Al Qaeda, for the first time since the Soviet Afghan War, was fighting in cooperation with American foreign policy objectives.

The Impeachment of Clinton was attempted: not due to technology transfers to china, not due to felonies, not for possible murder, not for another illegal American war, not for the first WTC attack where the FBI allowed terrorists to acquire the weapons, not for numerous white collar crimes, but for a blowjob. Naturally one cannot expect for the Congress to go against the type of lobbying that provided the Chinese man with the chance to sell the Communist Chinese ICBM plans if the congress itself is engaged in this. Or for that matter to investigate the type of crimes which they themselves engaged in. Or go after the president for drugs when this would merely disrupt the bipartisan cooperation in pursuit of coke and high class hookers.

The Year 2000 came. The computers were not destroyed by having the wrong date.

People seek the end of the world for many reasons; psychological, sociological, religious and ultimately anthropological. There has always been something about America as a nation that has seemed to herald a ‘New Age’. Hence the strange and creepy ‘Novo Ordo Seclorum’ on the dollar.

The Puritans came here to establish God’s kingdom. The Mormons were chased West to build theirs. The Whites ended the world of the natives; the natives themselves have many prophecies. Some Mayan Calendars stopped at 2012, leading to the last craze for the end.

The supposed end in the year 2000 was based on Biblical and then technical grounds. It did not occur, unless one considers the election of George W Bush a herald of the end times.

Video bibliography

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9sPJqmkdQI&list=WLGMH5DUuPQmrawxp9Nxw-4uYnVjublb-s

Clinton Chronicles

Terrorstorm

Kosovo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGT1F0jYhFw&list=WLGMH5DUuPQmrawxp9Nxw-4uYnVjublb-s

Skulls

The 'Skulls', notes from Anthony Sutton's work on the subject

An Example of Elite intermarriage.

Is George W. Bush the product of inbreeding?

“From time to time their plans go awry.” p. 53

“The left leaning segment in the press can always be relied upon to automatically assault ideas and information from the right, and vice versa” ibid

“....the in-group lacks morality and diversity. Its a kind of jet set politburo. Charming, power hungry and myopic at the same time...”

“It is doubtful if John D Rockefeller or Mrs Russell Sage, and certainly the Ford family, ever understood how these funds would be used for a long term conditioning plan”

The elite need shadows, hence the plethora of secret societies existing for their private needs, outside of even the confines of a secret government.

'The point to hold in mind is that both groups use Hegelian theory of the state as a start point, ie the state is superior to the individual. Prussian militarism, Nazism and Marxism have the same philosophical roots.'

p.63

'all that exists publicly for the order is the charter of the Russell Trust and that tells you nothing'-p.66

'Hegelian absurdities have thoroughly penetrated the U.S. educational system....'

-p. 118

“Some of the biggest men in the US and in commerce and manufacturing know that there is a power so organized, so subtle, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when condemning it.”

-Woodrow Wilson

Ethos

How free are men to choose their path in life and what are the limits of what one can do in life? Are they on the plains or in the mountains?

Our bodies remember the hunter gatherer days, and there is no reason to assume that it is not buried somewhere in our psyche, and all the collectivism versus individualism comes from this memory.

If our bodies are sick in cities, eating the agriculturalist’s diet, how about our spirit?

Nozick/Rawls Notes

The veil of ignorance blocks off this knowledge, such that one does not know what burdens and benefits of social cooperation might fall to him/her once the veil is lifted. With this knowledge blocked, parties to the original position must decide on principles for the distribution of rights, positions and resources in their society.

1. Nozick's discussion of Rawls's theory of justice raises the dialogue between libertarianism and liberalism to an epic level. The entitlement theory is sketched. In slogan form it states, "From each as they choose, to each as they are chosen". It comprises a theory of (1) justice in acquisition; (2) justice in rectification if (1) is violated (rectification which might require apparently redistributive measures); (3) justice in holdings, and (4) justice in transfer. Assuming justice in acquisition, entitlement to holdings is a function of repeated applications of (3) and (4). Nozick's entitlement theory is a non-patterned historical principle. Almost all other principles of distributive justice (egalitarianism, utilitarianism) are patterned principles of justice. Such principles follow the form, "to each according to...

Nozick’s view, is that all non-entitlement theories of justice are false. For all such theories claim that it is a necessary condition for a distribution’s being just that it have a certain structure or fit a certain pattern; but the Wilt Chamberlain example (which can be reformulated so that D1 is, instead of an egalitarian distribution, a distribution according to hard work, desert, or whatever) shows that a distribution (such as D2) can be just even if it doesn’t have a particular structure or pattern.
Moreover, the example shows that “liberty upsets patterns,” that allowing individuals freely to use their holdings as they choose will inevitably destroy any distribution advocated by non-entitlement theories, whether they be socialist, egalitarian liberal, or some other theory of distribution. And the corollary of this is that patterns destroy liberty, that attempts to enforce a particular distributional pattern or structure over time will necessarily involve intolerable levels of coercion, forbidding individuals from using the fruits of their talents, abilities, and labor as they see fit.

Secession

Pros:

The federal government has failed to secure the border, seceding would allow Texas to secure itself against the failed country it borders to the south.

Everyone in Texas would cease paying the illegal income tax. This would mean a mass of capital available.

Texas could get away from using the dollar whose value has been dropping consistently

Texas national guard would not be deployed to the Eurasian landmass to fight low intensity conflicts when they are supposed to be weekend warriors who assist in disasters

Texas would now be able to negotiate its own trade treaties, to benefit its workers. This would mean no NAFTA/ CAFTA with its economic dislocations

Texas could follow the will of its people in regards to abortion as Roe v. Wade would not apply

Texas would be free to develop without the mass of federal regulation. This would mean high international competitiveness. Texas is a globally competitive-sized economy as is. This would also mean more small business

Texas could uphold its anti-drone statutes, extend protections to the right to bear arms, and opt out of the Obamacare disaster as well as any future disasters legislated by Washington

Texas would be free to set its own minimum wage laws. This would create jobs

Texas would be free from Corporate Taxes. This could mean even more companies headquartering in Austin and more activity in the Houston Port. Federal duties on shipping would be gone.

Texas would be free to enforce existing drug statues according to the model used by the federal government or revamp them.

No excise taxes on tobacco and liquor. No more environmental regulation at the federal level.

Cons: the U.S. Federal Government believes in a strong union theory of the Constitution that regards secession as illegal because the constitution represents 'government by the people as a whole' rather than by the states coming together as units and forming the federal government. This would mean they would respond with force as they have in the past when states tried to leave the union. Another problem would be all recipients of federal aid would be out of their benefits.