The Beginning and Ends of the Cosmos
The universe, it has been reckoned
by many of the best minds, began in a single instant. Time and space
were infinitely suppressed so that in essence they curved infinitely
and were one. There existed a singularity. In this singularity, the
form that is said only to exist in reality at the center of a black
hole, time and space did not exist. There was true void. The
singularity was the beginning, after it; all time marched forward in
innumerable instants. But what of before? All faiths claim that some
act of creation took place, in which a volitional transcendental mind
existed which could will reality into existence. The Higher power is
said to have existed without the lower. This religious explanation
was a noble attempt to explain existence. But it is a failure. The
Jains alone conceived that the universe is completely infinite. The
universe has no beginning in time and no end in space.
At the tiniest level, the universe
seems to break into smaller and smaller pieces. Some invent other
dimensions, other worlds in which to explain this one. Worship of
numbers survives as the error of taking temporal reality and splicing
cause and effect into an infinite number of universes. Thus says
string theory, 'If I cannot unify the infinitely large and the small
I will try to go beyond them'. For centuries, men depended on an
Other to explain what their sense and their mind found at the fore.
Time is not a thing like this; it does not produce other realities.
Time is linked to matter and does not exist outside it. The fact that
A causes B does not mean that in some undefinable existence it will
somehow cause C. Time is only an aspect of reality, a movement of all
things in existence from birth to decay. It begins with matter and
ends thus.
In the realm of the very small
atomism seems wrong, for all particles seem to have smaller pieces.
For atomism was the tenet that the universe was made up of
indivisible stuff. Atomism thus seems false.
The universe is either a
self-contained reality of known reality, that is the visible universe
surrounded on its confines by an infinite and impenetrable sea of
dark matter, or it is one universe among many, each an island to
itself, separated from one another at distances so great that light
cannot reach from one to the other as long as each is maintained in
existence. You might object to this, but yes, universes are mortal,
and they perishable. They perish. This one will perish.
The end of the visible universe is
the cosmic horizon, what is beyond it decides the question. If other
universes exist beyond this horizon, we may be part of a grand cosmic
drift, in which each universe bubbles out from another. The universes
would be like ripples in a pool each ebbing out from some cosmic
epicenter, our universe drifting further and further into an abyss
with innumerable others. Or there could be nothing, the kind of void
that nature was said to abhor. Another possibility for the universe
would be that of eternal cyclical rebirth and death. Having sketched
possible beginnings of the universe, it is now proper to speak of its
end. It's death.
The demolition of creation in a
two-step, or rather two steps.
Step 1: The cosmological proof of
god's existence is shown to be illogical. Mustn't the universe have a
cause? What are cause and effect? Cause and effect simply mean
continuity from one thing to another. A famous philosopher David Hume
said that one cannot assume that cause follows effects because one
cannot view all causes and effects. Denying cause and effect is too
much, let us simply accept that science makes sense and cause are
followed by the effect, and that effect requires cause by necessity.
But cause and effect are part of reality. Reality is the cosmos. So
the thing we know as reality cannot be said to require an immediate
cause like all that is in it.
Step 2: The end of the fine-tuning
argument, by the finest tuned of all forces. Others, ignorant of the
pure chaos which produced life, ignorant of the capability of an
infinite set to produce any number of values, have raised the
argument that the universe is fine-tuned to produce life. But there
is one force, so mysterious yet so powerful, that is the finest tuned
of all forces. The rate of expansion of the cosmos in all directions,
the cosmological constant, propelled by dark energy that seems to
grow more powerful as the galaxies drift farther from one another. It
is this energy, if it continues to accelerate expansion, that will
destroy the universe, leaving nothing but a sea of subatomic
particles.
So unless god is as much a prick as
he appears to be in all scriptures, or unless he is a worse demon
than all the devils he claims to stand against, one must find
creationism totally absurd, and on some level, insane.
And of the End times.....
Any universe with laws of physics
somewhat close to ours will end in three ways. One is the Big Crunch,
whereby the universe collapses. Our current universe will probably
not suffer this. The other possibility, if the cosmological constant
slowed, is known as the big freeze. The big freeze is a slow and
painful process whereby all matter runs out of steam, where all stars
die, where light cannot reach from one galaxy to another. Darkness
would fill every sky. Beyond this, matter finally loses cohesion.
The last ending of the cosmos would
be the big rip. The acceleration of the cosmos becomes one day just
too great. Everything would fly apart, with matter itself ripped into
quarks.
But at the very end, all that will
remain in the universe men once thought to have been made for his
biological cousins, will be swirling invincible black holes, whose
massive event horizons will be the last to evaporate into
nothingness. Perhaps if this universe were indeed the child of some
long dead cosmos destroyed by the same forces, all would recur again.
Perhaps you and I, this essay, and all the joys and terrors and
trepidations of life. Perhaps...
And then there was darkness across
the face of the deep.....
No comments:
Post a Comment